Paying a Global Team When Your Bank Isn’t Built for It

You hired a developer in Warsaw, a designer in Manila and a part-time ops person in Lisbon. Great decisions, all three. Then the first pay run arrived and you lost an afternoon to a banking portal that wanted a SWIFT code, an intermediary bank and a reason for the transfer.

Nobody warns founders about this part. Hiring advice covers where to find people and how to onboard them. Almost none of it covers the fact that your bank was designed to move money between two domestic accounts, and everything beyond that is an exception it handles reluctantly.

The cost you are not tracking

Run the numbers on a distributed team of five, each paid monthly from a standard business account.

Wire fees land somewhere around $25 to $40 per transfer. Correspondent banks in the chain deduct another $15 to $30 each, often from the amount arriving rather than the amount sent. Exchange rate margins, typically 2% to 3% above the real rate, never appear as a line item because the markup is built into the rate itself.

Five people at $4,000 a month means roughly $240,000 in annual payroll. The friction on that, conservatively, runs $7,000 to $9,000. Nobody invoices you for it. Your bookkeeper categorizes the visible portion as bank charges and the invisible portion disappears entirely.

That figure is a hire. Or four months of runway, depending on where you are.

Why it gets worse before it gets better

Early on, you absorb it because the alternative requires attention you do not have. Then the team grows, the currencies multiply, and the workaround calcifies into process.

Three specific problems compound:

  1. Your contractors absorb the deductions. Someone quoted $4,000 receives $3,870, notices, and either raises it awkwardly or quietly resents it. Neither outcome helps.
  2. Timing becomes unpredictable. Transfers taking three days become five across a weekend or a local holiday you did not know existed. People planning around payday stop trusting your payday.
  3. Reconciliation eats hours. Different amounts arriving on different dates through different routes turns a ten-minute task into a standing afternoon commitment.

 

Founders under cash pressure feel all three acutely, and the temptation is to delay pay runs rather than fix the plumbing. That instinct is worth resisting, because running low on money distorts judgment in exactly the places you least want distortion, and paying your team late is one of the faster ways to lose the people keeping the thing alive.

What actually fixes it

Three options exist, and the right one depends on scale rather than sophistication.

Multi-currency business accounts. For most teams under about fifteen people, this solves the problem entirely. Providers give you local receiving and sending details in several countries, so your Polish developer gets a domestic transfer rather than an international wire. Correspondent charges disappear, exchange margins drop to somewhere near 0.4%, and transfers usually land same day. Setup takes a week and requires nothing new from your team. 

Employer of record services. Worth considering once you want employees rather than contractors, or when local compliance starts creating genuine exposure. Expensive per head, and overkill until someone raises a misclassification question.

Stablecoin payouts. Dollar-pegged tokens settle in minutes for a flat few dollars regardless of amount. Useful specifically when your team sits in markets where conventional banking is slow, restricted or unreliable, which describes more of the world than founders in stable economies tend to assume. Several people would rather hold digital dollars than their local currency, and that preference is worth knowing about before you assume it is exotic.

Where the stablecoin route gets real

Two things determine whether this works or creates a new mess.

The first is whether your team wants it. Never impose a payment method on someone who did not ask. Offer it, let people choose, and keep conventional transfer available for everyone else.

The second is the platform you convert through. Licensing standards vary enormously across jurisdictions, and this is not a place to optimise for the lowest fee. Regulated operators segregate client funds, run transaction monitoring and submit to independent audit, which is what stands between your payroll and a provider’s insolvency. Handling cross-border payments with Independent Reserve or a comparable licensed provider means the rails sit under a regulator’s supervision, with published terms you can check against a public register.

Tax treatment needs care too. Paying contractors in tokens does not simplify anything, and both sides carry record-keeping obligations that differ by country. Talk to an accountant who has done it before rather than working it out from forum posts.

The founder problem underneath

Payment friction is rarely the actual issue. It is a symptom of a business still routing every operational decision through one person.

You are handling pay runs because you always have, and because handing them over feels like more work than doing them. That reasoning holds until the team is eight people and you are spending a day a month on transfers you could have automated in an afternoon. This is the same trap as staying the doer rather than becoming the owner, applied to a task nobody thinks of as delegable because it touches money.

Fix the rails, then hand the process over with a documented approval step. Both halves matter.

What to do this week

Four moves, roughly an hour total:

  1. Pull your last three months of international transfers and total every fee, then estimate the exchange margin at 2.5% of volume. Look at the number properly.
  2. Open a multi-currency business account. This alone recovers most of it.
  3. Ask your team, individually, how payment currently reaches them and whether the timing causes problems. You will learn something.
  4. Write down who approves pay runs and who executes them, even if both are you today. That document is what lets you stop doing it later.

 

None of this is strategic work. It is also several thousand dollars a year and a recurring afternoon you are currently donating to your bank for nothing.

Share this article :

Speak to our experts

Tell us what you're interested in

Select the solutions you'd like to explore further.

When are you looking to implement the above solution(s)?

Do you have an investment range in mind for the solution(s)?

Remarks

Advertising Billboard:

Subscribe to The Latest Industry Insights

Ooi Sang Kuang

Chairman, Non-Executive Director

Mr. Ooi is the former Chairman of the Board of Directors of OCBC Bank, Singapore. He served as a Special Advisor in Bank Negara Malaysia and, prior to that, was the Deputy Governor and a Member of the Board of Directors.

ChainUp: Leading Provider of Digital Asset Exchange & Custody Solutions
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.